Monday, January 30, 2012

Addendum to Previous Post

One thing I failed to mention in my last post is opting out of either privacy policy is fairly easy, but actually implementing it to oneself may be impossible for one and very easy for the other.  With Google, you would have to abandon all their services.  I wish anyone luck trying to avoid the everything Google world.

As far as Staples is concerned, this one is very easy – just don’t shop with them – not online and definitely not in the store.  Just like I have done.  They don’t deserve the business anyway

Thursday, January 26, 2012

Commentary: Google and Staples–A Tale of 2 Privacy Policies

Yesterday, Google announced that it would start tracking users information across the 60+ applications hosted by Google including their search engine, Google+, Gmail, android phones and even Blogger, which is where this blog is hosted.  In a way it is good that Google is upfront about tracking user information and targeting ads and pop-ups to what the user is looking at or searching for.  Its bad that anybody who uses anything Google will be tracked and market targeted with ads that they may not want or care about.  To make matters worse, even though the information is anonymously store, it still knows who you are.  Since I am such a strong advocate of privacy, I have actually considered moving this blog to a more friendly site like WordPress.  I will let everybody know if I plan on doing such a thing, but for now I am here and will continue to be here at least until mid-March when the changes take place.  However, the one thing that I think is funny now is when I load up the blog, I see ads for Staples on my anti-Staples blog.  I wonder if anybody else sees this like I do.  I am interested in hearing from anybody who does.

Staples, on the other hand, has decided to be very secretive about the data it collects, where it collects it, and how long it is stored.  Just a look at the Staples.com website shows that there is NO indication that Staples is PCI compliant.  I am not going to go into details on what exactly this is because it is complex, but a search will provide plenty of information on this standard. 

If you read my previous post about the Better Business Bureau closing my case against Staples, one thing should have been obvious:  the letter was generic and computer generated.  I highly doubt that any REAL person closed this complaint, but instead it was closed because it was open for exactly 3 weeks and Staples had refused to respond to my last complaint in 5 business days.  I believe that this was purposely done by Staples just so they would not have to explain how my email address got linked by another family member’s credit card.  This is definitely fraud which the company is avoiding and thus smartly let the time to let the case close itself without having to respond.  Shame on Staples for this action!  Later, I will be telling of other privacy policies that Staples clearly violated and I will guarantee it will anger people! 

So, Google smartly lets people know of the company’s intentions upfront, whereas Staples makes claims that it does nothing wrong and doesn’t violate any laws, but who’s laws are they going by anyway?  I know in the days and weeks ahead much will be said about the Google privacy change, but the Staples one will sadly continue because the company is so sly and divertive that their evil ways will continue until someone really decides to sue this evil company for the theft which they are creating. 

We can only hope that eventually the smart thing will be done with both companies and their privacy policies will change and will not steal customer’s information without their knowledge.  I highly doubt there will be any significant change in the near future.

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

The Cash Register (Friend or Foe?)

Yes, the title may sound funny, but realistically this item brings real fear into many who go anywhere near it.  The funny part is that in some ways it should be feared as I will be explaining in the next couple of posts. 

At the heart of many cash registers is a computer, not a sophisticated one but still a computer of sorts.  Sometimes it does what you want and sometimes it does what it wants no matter what you do.

Way back in the days of Woolworths, our old cash registers were NCR branded machines.  These machines were simple devices with multiple keys for different functions.  When first using the register, you had to put in your employee number, which was a matter of typing in the numbers then hitting the NO SALE key.  However, sometimes, the cashiers (I am also guilty of doing this on occasion too) got stupid and forgot to input their number and just hit the NO SALE key instead.  By doing this, the cash drawer opened and one always hoped that nobody except the on-duty manager saw you do it.  It was surprisingly that we were NEVER robbed because accessing the register would be so easy.  Any register not on the front end of the store was handled by a department person and they were given a register key to unlock the register when needed to use it.  Again, it was important that the register was locked when someone walked away from the register.

The biggest issue with these registers was that it was extremely easy to make errors with this system.  Amongst the problems include under ringing, over-ringing, and even not ringing up merchandise at all.  While the third item can happen under any system, the first two could easily be avoided if care was taken.  And that is the big IF.  Many employees over the years were terminated because of the other two ways and sometimes it wasn’t even intentional.

The normal register key put the register into REG mode.  However, there were other keys that would put the register into other modes.  The X mode was when a reading on the register was to be taken or to put change in the drawer.  The Y mode was used by managers to do a cash pickup when the screen indicated that there was a limit.  It was shown on the screen as a half an 8 on the far left side of the screen.  The bad thing about this is that the symbol could also be seen on the customer’s side of the LCD display and which means that a customer would know when the drawer is loaded with money.  Again, how we never got robbed really surprised me!  The Z mode was used at the end of the week to clear out the weekly sales numbers and get tallies for the various departments being counted for the week.  This was dangerous if this was done by accident and yes it was done many times and it makes weekly tallies that much harder to calculate.

The register keyboard also featured the standard TAXABLE and NON-TAXABLE keys as well as 10 special keys used to track weekly sales.  During a sales week, a sticker was placed on the front of the display that listed what each of the special function keys were used for.  For example, a popular use was “25% off Toys”. and “25% off Watches”.  After typing in the dollar amount, the cashier would hit either TAXABLE, NON-TAXABLE, or one of the special keys.  The special keys would automatically do the price reduction from the price input.  There was no scanner on these registers and EVERY single item in the store had to be individually priced.  Guess who spent hours pricing stuff?  ME!!  Later, I will discuss pricing and inventory control.

This approach lasted for about 7 years until we received a new toy: brand new registers and modern ones at that.  These new registers were manufactured by IBM and the manuals consisted of about 200 pages of how-to usage.  I was the first person to read the manual one afternoon cover-to-cover.  Mostly skimming over a lot of the information as it was repeated over and over.  Above anything else, these registers had scanners, which simplified the entire process of inventory control.  Now, merchandise could be checked to see if it in stock in almost a real-time manner by going into the office computer.  However, only managers could do this and because it was only updated daily it wasn’t always accurate, but it was closer than wasting time looking for nothing. 

The new registers featured a two-line LCD display of about 12 characters and when the display wasn’t in use it would scroll “Thank You for Shopping at Woolworth” or whatever was programmed into the main office computer.  The confusion of keys such as TAXABLE, NON-TAXABLE, and function keys were all eliminated by these new registers.  It was like heaven.

I do believe that these new registers was a huge plus to the company, but inevitably led to its eventual downfall because ways that employees could rip off the company no longer worked and huge inventory discrepancies were no longer the norm.  It was only about 2 years later that the company started shutting down stores.  Coincidence, I highly doubt it.


I don’t really remember much about the registers from HQ except that the scanner cord was about 15 feet long and could easily strangle an employee if not careful.  Seven weeks of employment really didn’t allow me to remember much of those registers except for how dirty they were, but then again the whole place was always dusty and dirty.  Maybe it was all that dirt that clogged my mind about my memory of their systems

Of course, nothing could compare to Staples registers, which leads to the next topic.

Up Next:  The Evolution and De-Evolution of the Staples’ Register System

Breaking News: BBB closes Staples Case

Sadly, the Better Business Bureau as responded by the following notice:

Dear Louis Brown :
This notification is in regards to your complaint submitted on 1/2/2012 1:52:12 PM against Staples, Inc.. Complaint # 8865501.


BBB has closed complaint #8865501.


After reviewing the position of all parties, BBB determined that the business made a reasonable effort to address the complaint and has closed the complaint. This complaint will be publicly reported on the business's BBB Business Review for 36 months.


If BBB has additional information to provide you to assist you in pursuing your complaint with a government agency, and/or provide you with some educational tips, the information will be displayed below.


Thank you.
Better Business Bureau

The only good thing about this is that the complaint will remain with the BBB for a while.  I do not consider this a win, but yet another series of lies that this time was persuaded by the BBB.  All I can say is beware if you use any charge card at Staples as the company could and WILL store your information whether you like it or not.  Once again, this is proof that Staples is absolutely the worst company and continues to scam.

Thursday, January 19, 2012

Barnes & Noble Extends a Free Membership (with Too Many Restrictions)

Just received a hilarious email from Barnes & Noble wanting me to redeem a limited 3 month membership to them by clicking on an email link.  Apparently they are trying to reach out to those long lost Borders customers who just don’t care.  Listed below are all the restrictions which makes me wonder what is this membership really good for…

The details:

Free Barnes & Noble Membership for a Limited Term Coupon Details

For one valid and current customer email address, this coupon can be redeemed once only per billing address at BN.COM. This offer is for new Barnes & Noble Members only, who have never participated in the Barnes & Noble Membership Program.

This coupon entitles you to one (1) Free Barnes & Noble Membership for a Limited Term. The Membership term is three (3) months, beginning on the date of coupon redemption. This coupon is valid at BN.com only from January 17, 2012, 2011 at 12:01am to January 31, 2012 at 2:59am Eastern Time.

Additional Rules Governing Use of this Coupon: This coupon is (i) not redeemable for cash or cash equivalents (including Gift Cards and eGift Cards); (ii) not valid on past or pre-ordered purchases; (iii) not eligible for purchases of any other products or services other than Barnes & Noble Membership; (iv) not valid on shipping or handling expenses or applicable sales tax; (v) not valid on purchases made from third parties accessible from the BN.COM website (e.g., used books, PC and video games, etc.); and (vi) not valid at Barnes & Noble retail bookstores, or Barnes & Noble College bookstores or websites. This coupon may not be combined with any other coupon or promotion or with the Educator Discount. Barnes&Noble.com is not responsible for typographical or pictorial errors. This offer is subject to change or discontinuation without notice; we will, however, honor properly placed orders with valid methods of payment with sufficient funds placed prior to such change or discontinuation. Void where prohibited by law


No wonder they are in such trouble…

Another Update: Staples Response

Here is what they said:

To reiterate, although a Rewards number was not used on this recent purchase, it was used in conjuction with the same credit card in the past. When the card is used regardless if used with a rewards number, the unique created code is recognized and will trigger a marketing email if one is assigned for the product purchased. Once again, this practice is in compliance with all regulations.

So let’s see what happens with my response saying that the names didn’t match!!

And the bull goes on…

BREAKING NEWS: Update on Staples Credit Card Scam

I just got back a response from Staples via the Better Business Bureau regarding my credit card complaint.  Here is their response:

“When a credit card is used in conjunction of a Rewards Account number, a unique indentifiable  code is created in our system. Only this code, customer name and email address is stored and will be recognized whenever that same credit card is used and will trigger a marketing email. This common practice is in compliance with all privacy and storage regulations.”

Certainly, I rejected this response since NO rewards card was used and I sent a letter back to Staples stating as such.  Let’s see how they respond to that…